Built
Open-source checks for completeness, window, and truncation. Runnable today, with a published method.
Billing replay study
Billed $50. Expected $150.
The issue reporter says the dry run repeated a wrong $50 invoice. Our released-tag H2 test reproduced it.
Proposed $2,500 study. One scenario, one release test. No customer deployment yet.
August 1 – September 1, 2026
Unseen$100
The preview and the invoice agreed. The approved price did not.
What happened
$150 for the month.
Dry run and invoice: $50.
An independent check of the approved price, before issuance.
The study
We calculate the expected amount ourselves, compare it with a dry run, and leave a regression test. No production access. No customer payment data.
Read the scopeWhere this stands
Open-source checks for completeness, window, and truncation. Runnable today, with a published method.
The HTTP decision API and Observe Mode wrapper are implemented and tested locally. They are not deployed or running in anyone's production path.
No customer is blocking live orders through Nobulex. A separate gateway prototype returns permit, block, or escalate. It has no customer result.
Questions
A proposed study of one billing change. Not a deployed billing product, and not a customer result.
No. The checks are open source. The gateway is local. This page will keep saying so until that changes.
No. A signature shows who signed a decision. It cannot turn a wrong source into a right one.
Billing accuracy for usage-based products. A fixed-fee audit now, a read-only scanner for self-contradictions in design, mutation checks in CI after that, and each layer gets built only once the one before it pays. The approach, with its limits stated.
Next
Tell us how you check invoice amounts before release.
nobulex.dev@gmail.com